What AI-generated design did I create?
Called “Re-purpose” with the slogan being, “Rethink. Reuse. Re-create,” is an upcycle marketplace app that brings together a community and a place for item(s) to have a second home in other ways. It creates a space for donors to post and upcyclers to buy. Features include a marketplace feed, a community showcase section that allows users to share their projects, an upload feature to post free or priced items, and a profile that stores the user’s wishlist, listings, or projects.
Was generative AI a good designer or assistant?
Gemini was a good assistant. I tried to similarly follow what Anthropic’s course discussed, laying out what AI should assist with, work together on, and do on my own. I appreciate the questions it asks throughout the process, as it provides a form of guidance rather than a straightforward solution. I also questioned, added my suggestions/options, and provided clarity while encouraging the AI to ask more questions. The conversation was quite long, so I screen-shot certain areas to highlight.
As for Google Stitch, it was a good designer to a certain extent. It generates a simple layout that would help with inspiration. The prompt would also need to be descriptive, as it might not provide the exact vision of what I have in mind, but it’s a good start. I also noticed some improvements being made, as it actually makes the changes if it’s simple enough.


What accelerated my design process?
Gemini accelerated the process by creating a plan and guidance on what needs to be done. It asked questions, listed different features and ideas, explained the user journey and flow, while I still gave my input for refinement. Further along, it even mentions how the app would be monetized and the minimum viable product if we were to launch it now. Google Stitch helps visualize possible screens to explore, update, and change in a short amount of time.
What slowed me down?
For Gemini, if I wanted to backtrack to ask, revise, or fix something, the conversation can get very long, and it can get difficult to keep track and scroll endlessly to find a specific section. I also think it goes a little too fast in the research portion, which would require me to go back to refine further. Google Stitch can still be limited, simple, and at times inconsistent with the screens.
How might I approach my design process differently using tools like these in the future?
I can see it as a way for brainstorming ideas, laying out an initial plan, and screen exploration in the early stages, especially when I’m stuck or uncertain how to approach.
What are the ethical implications of completely outsourcing UX design to AI?
Outsourcing UX design to AI would shorten the time; however, it would create an environment that would strip human empathy, understanding, and creativity in the design process. I think it would cause a shift in where designers no longer learn UX and lack critical thinking skills. AI shouldn’t replace designers entirely, but rather be used as a tool and work alongside designers.




Leave a comment